Self-Perceived Dental Public Health Competencies of Dental Graduates: A Comparison of Traditional and Modified Curricula in Karachi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33897/fujd.v4i1.354Keywords:
Competencies, Curriculum, Dental Graduates, Dental Public Health, Self-perceptionAbstract
Objective: To compare self-perceived dental public health competence in fresh dental graduates, learning through traditional and modified dental curricula in private dental colleges of Karachi.
Materials and Methods: Across-sectional study with a self-administered questionnaire (21 items) on a 3-point Likert scale was conducted with dental graduates of four private dental colleges in Karachi. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Mean and SD were reported for age and self-perceived competency scale items were analyzed by applying an independent t-test.
Results: 255 participants completed the survey (response rate=88.5%) with a mean age of 24.02±0.832 (male 24% & female 76%) ranging from 22 to 26 years. The graduates were of almost equal number from both the groups (T=51%, M=49%). Graduates who learnt public health from a traditional curriculum had a higher perception of their competence compared to the modified curriculum group with a significant p-value=0.04.
Conclusion: This study identified that overall fresh dental graduates perceived themselves competent enough to deal with dental public health issues. Moreover, dental graduates who studied from the traditional curriculum perceived themselves as more competent in most aspects of dental public health competency than those who learned from the modified curriculum.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All copyrights © are reserved with the author(s) under (CC BY-NC 4.0). Foundation University Journal of Dentistry (FUJD) is an open-access peer-reviewed journal that allows free access to its published articles, in addition, to copying and use for research and academic purposes; provided the article is correctly cited. FUJD does not allow commercial use of any article published in FUJD. All articles published represent the view of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of FUJD.